Tuesday, 23 February 2016

DECODING DIGITAL PEDAGOGY

Once I had finished reading the 2 passages I was a little blow away. Our first reading by Fyfe made me feel like I got the grip of digital pedagogy, now I feel like ‘I miss the train completely’.
Digital pedagogy in the mind of these authors seems to be without boundary, I felt that it was being treated like a concept that is yet to be fully unravelled. I can relate, in a way, to the authors’ enthusiasm, after years of being taught a single dull technique of how things should be done, discovering a new and exciting point-of-view (technique) is liberating.


Reading these passages I wonder whether it will be conducive in a classroom situation, a room filled with energetic adolescents. Assuming it is conducted in a subtle and well structured manner, it would be perfect.  We would first need to see if it will not challenge the culture of the school, or all schools (is it in par with the educational system).


“For some, teaching begins with authority and expertise. For the digital pedagogue, teaching begins with inquiry.”


 I mean, structures in place have purpose; hence they have stood fast for so many generations. Do I want disruption of a system that has not failed many generations of successful people? No, so basically what should be kept in mind is inclusivity. Let’s use digital pedagogy to cater for the diversity in our classrooms; so that more of our learner can achieve the goals set-out for the grade. Digital pedagogy should ignite learners’ ability to think for themselves, critical thinking, and self-motivation to learn and understand the text.


Goal orientated behaviour seems to be the way forward in my eyes. The kind of people we would like our learners to eventually become can be orchestrated through digital pedagogy. This being said, one can see that Pedagogy is a powerful tool, and should be used only to add significant contribution to the curriculum and not just for the sake of having it been performed.



I would also like to share my opinion on criticizing LMS-based teaching. With reference to online teaching, I am not disagreeing with the authors, but let us not forget that digital pedagogy needs us to unlearn many misconceptions (which may not be easy for all of us), thus LMS should be viewed (and used) as a foundation phase to teaching (in my opinion). Digital pedagogy should be seen a more advanced, more professional way of teaching.

Thursday, 18 February 2016

Digital pedagogy unplugged

I would like to think of myself as a traditionalist, in the sense that I like to use techniques with which I have had an affirmative encounter. I really hope you find my essence in this blog.

After reading Fyfe’s article I could finally encapsulate the dynamics of pedagogy. People all around the world have different learning abilities and needs. I unfortunately am unable to speak on behalf of everyone, in our diverse nation (and world). What I can say is that we should first focus on our target market/group, mine being the life science and natural science class. As an educator I need to keep in mind my class’ best interests, and to accomplish this I need to understand teaching is not only about transferring information from one body to the next ( it entails much more then that). As an educator you might be the only role model the learner can link to the field of study, and possible future career. With that being said, we should be mindful to not mislead the learners, and drifting them into every technological advancement of teaching. School is about a lot more than just learning, finding yourself (knowing where you stand and who you are in society), and studying different opinions (of discovers/inventors/scientists).

 The spectrum of real world expectations need to be communicated to the learners, and integrated into the school system. Digital pedagogy is a tool that can be used alongside traditional pedagogy, to not only spark and inspire the young minds of our learners, but this will assist us to engraft into the learner an optimistic outlook with reference to research.

Moving away from the ‘classroom at school’, University offers so much more than just a piece of paper proving that you can think for yourself. If you think about it, university thought you good work ethics, made you more cultured (in my opinion), and made you a critical thinker (using digital pedagogy). If you engage properly with the text you will be able to familiarise yourself with much of the techniques described in the article (Because it was applied on us, during our undergraduate studies).

In conclusion, I say use the tools that you have been granted effectively. Everything in moderation, in the same breath I agree with digital pedagogy.
Below are two YOUTUBE video links I think you will enjoy.